Monthly Archives: August 2010

Faith’n'Fiction Saturday Round Table: Godric by Frederick Buechner

Godric (novel)

Image via Wikipedia

Earlier this month I read the book Godric by Frederick Buechner for a Faith’n'Fiction Saturday Round Table taking place over at My Friend Amy (for a list of others that have taken place and that will take place the rest of this year) with seven other bloggers including Amy.

In alphabetical order, by name, the seven are:

We participated in an e-mail discussion starting this past Sunday and lasting through the later part of this week. Each of us are posting a part of the discussion sometime during the weekend (after the weekend, I will edit this post to include actual links to the posts themselves, so you don’t have to search for them).

Here’s the part I was asked to post:

Teresa: It took me a while to get into the novel. Godric’s voice is so strange, and it was especially hard for me to get used to the shifts from first-person to third-person. But once I settled in, I enjoyed it. Like Hannah said, self-perception versus others’ perception seems like a major theme. And l think those shifts in person ended up being a clever way of showing the difference in how Godric views himself and how he imagines his biographer, Reginald, sees him.

Carrie: the style of the language and the switching point of view kept Godric at a distance – I didn’t ever connect with him as a character. I felt like I was watching him from far away, instead of viewing him and his life at a close and intimate level, if that makes sense. Sure, I was privy to some intimate details of his life, but as a character, I never connected emotionally with him.

Bryan (that’s my real name, shhhh, don’t tell anyone): As a person who once wrote poetry and studied poetry in college, I think one of the first things that stood out to me in reading Godric were the poetic qualities of the writing. I especially noticed a plethora of passages with alliteration in them.

Dalai Lama with Marco Pannella

Image by dumplife (Mihai Romanciuc) via Flickr

Another thing that stood out to me was the mixture of the sacred and the profane, especially in that Godric didn’t glaze over his faults throughout his life and, in fact, laughed at them. Godric, as Pete mentioned, was fallible — and yet a saint. Personally, I am reminded of living with the Benedictine monks at Mt. Saviour Monastery in Pine City, N.Y. for six weeks about 16 years ago and how refreshing it was to see that they were human, but that God worked, and continues to work, through, and sometimes despite, their humanity.  I also am reminded of the Dalai Lama and how when you see interviews with him, often he is laughing.

Pete: I think a lot of people have a reaction similar to Carrie’s due to the language. It’s tough to penetrate for many readers. It has a rhythm and a flow to it that’s incredibly unique. It’s almost like reading Shakespeare or Milton in that you’ve got to attune yourself to the movement of the writing before you can actually settle into it and ride it as it gallops along.

Carrie: Pete – the comparison to Shakespeare is apt, as I found myself “reading it aloud” in my head in a sing-song way, almost like it was in iambic pentameter. (Former theater major here.)

Teresa: I had the same experience, Carrie, although I ended up liking the language more. I actually spent a good bit of time during one chapter trying to figure out if there was a clear meter there. It wasn’t consistent throughout, but there was a definite rhythm to the language, and at times it really did read like poetry.

Hannah: For me the language was fun — even thrilling at points. I love that lyrical, poetic quality in prose.

For the other parts of the discussion, please visit the blogs listed above later in the weekend.

Addendum

I also want to add this review of Godric by Pete Peterson from The Rabbit Room, in which part of what he says about the book:

It is the book that fundamentally altered the way I read and the way I write. It is the novel that moved me to write my own. It is the canon by which I have measured every book read since. Am I gushing?

Um, yeah, Pete, you are, but that is all right. After reading it, I concur that it truly is a great book and like you, challenge “anyone to read this book and not be changed.”

I purchased this book from From My Shelf Books in Wellsboro, Pa.


Patron of the Week: Mr. I-Don’t-Need-Your-Help-Oh-Wait-Yes-I-Do

Graphic for button from New Media Consortium on Flickr

This week’s Patron of the Week comes from the Land of Cotton, look away, look away…okay, not really, but for some reason, that’s where my mind was going as I started to write this. This week’s Patron of the Week actually comes from the Land of Numb Nuttery.

Please welcome Mr. I-Don’t-Need-Your-Help-Oh-Wait-Yes-I-Do.

At our library, we have a grand total of four– yes, that’s right, people, as U2 sings at the beginning of the song “Vertigo:” “Uno, dos, tres, catorce…,” right? ;-) (for the benefit of my wife who absolutely hates that song because that lead-in is wrong and which I love for exactly the same reason) — public computers. Patrons and guests can sign up at a check-in computer to be assigned to one of the four. So today, a patron, this week’s Patron of the Week, asks for a guest card. I ask him if he has used our computers previously. He says “yes” and then proceeds to walk right past the check-in computer to one of the four computers.

“Um, sir, you have to sign up at this computer here…”

I tell him as I point to the check-in computer.

“You put in your bar code there, and then it will assign you to one of the four computers and then you put in your bar code again at that computer.”

“Oh, yeah. I knew that.”

Of course, I don’t know if he actually said that last phrase, but I heard it in my head anyway.

“If you knew that, then why did you go right past it to the wrong computer, numb nuts?”

No, I didn’t say that to him either, but yes, I did think it.

And now just for my wife:

Have you ever dealt with a customer who thought they knew exactly what they were doing, only come to find out that they really didn’t? Have you ever been one of those customers?

It’s called The Pause

For this week’s Flashback Friday, where I use  St. Ignatius of Loyola’s Examen as a guide, I will be looking back at not only this past week, but also  this past month. So with that mind, I ask myself and you:

For what am I/are you least grateful this past month?

For what am I/are you most grateful this past month?

Least grateful

As usual, I have a hundred thoughts  racing through my mind, not the least of which is I don’t have enough time to write this, because I have to go to work at the library. Wednesday, I took out The Girl Who Kicked The Hornet’s Nest by Stieg Larsson from there and then on Thursday, I learned that I already was a week behind on an online read-along, sponsored by Amanda of The Zen Leaf, of Bleak House by Charles Dickens. This normally wouldn’t be such a big deal, but today and tomorrow I work at the library all day and then tomorrow after work, I leave for a retreat to Mount Saviour Monastery near Elmira, N.Y., where I am a Benedictine oblate. I will be there until Monday.

So my mind was, and still is to some degree, racing with thoughts: How am I going to be able to finish before Wednesday what amounts to 13 chapters of Dickens, which on a good day is only slightly obtuse to my 21st century reading eyes? On the flip side, I just started the Larsson book and was just starting to get back into the series, and, on top of that, when I go to the library today, I might have Mockingjay, the third part of the Hunger Games trilogy, by Suzanne Collins waiting for me on the hold shelf. How am I going to read all this? Wouldn’t it be wrong to go to a monastery for a scheduled retreat, just to catch up on reading secular books?

This entire month, to some degree, has been like this: getting caught up in the busyness of life, whether it be reading or checking off any other number of mental checklists (which now is “Write this,” “grab something to eat before going to work,” “grab something on the way to eat for lunch later,” “I don’ t even have time to finish this.”).

MOST grateful

So because of all that said above, I’ve decided this weekend truly will be a retreat. I’m not taking any of the aforementioned books with me tomorrow night, not because I don’t think I can’t have secular books with me. However, in the spirit of simplicity and charity, two of the principles of St. Benedict, I am making it easy on myself and being charitable to my peace of mind in not taking any of the aforementioned books…and in this case, distractions from the reason I am there: to retreat from the world.

In short, I am putting the world on pause.

So for what are you least/most grateful this past month?

Survey says: Classics can be “page-turners” too

Last week I posed the question: Are “page-turners” always “pulp fiction”? with my belief then that, for the most part, they were. Why I believed that is because off the top of my head, I couldn’t think of a classic book (by classic, I mean, at least 25 years old and most usually more than 100 years old) that I couldn’t put down once I started reading it. However, four of you responded with classics that you considered “page-turners.”

  1. The Wife: Jane Eyre by Charlotte Brontë.
  2. Marie from The Boston Bibliophile: The Slave by Isaac Bashevis Singer, All The King’s Men by Robert Penn Warren and A Tree Grows In Brooklyn by Betty Smith.
  3. Brahm from Alfred Lives Here: Wuthering Heights by yet another Brontë, Emily and The Talented Mr. Ripley by Patricia Highsmith, including all the sequels.
  4. Bunk Strutts from Tacky Raccoons: A Night To Remember by Walter Lord, and two others, although they aren’t 25 years old, he decided “that the rule didn’t apply to these white-knuckle books about true events.” Those two are: Lost Moon by Jim Lovell, on which the movie Apollo 13 was based, and A Perfect Storm by Sebastian Junger, which also was made into a movie.

A fifth person, Quirkyloon, also responded, but didn’t seem to understand the question as she mentioned the Twilight series by Stephenie Meyer:

And I was soooo annoyed with the main character Bella. I really didn’t like her, but yet I couldn’t stop reading until I knew the ending.

Weird, huh?

Um, yeah. Also weird that you didn’t read the question I posed last week ;-) .

Out of those mentioned, I’ve read:

  1. All The King’s Men, which is one of my favorite books, but which I don’t consider a “page-turner,” because to me, it was one I really wanted to savor and didn’t want to devour.
  2. A Night To Remember, which I also enjoyed, but again I don’t consider a “page-turner,” because at a little over 200 pages in most editions, I think it’s too short. When I think of “page-turners,” as I mentioned last week, I think of mostly epics like The Stand by Stephen King.
  3. A Perfect Storm, which I absolutely would qualify as a “page-turner.” It reminds me of another nature “page-turner”: Into Thin Air by Jon Krakauer.

Since last week, I have thought of at least one classic that I considered a “page-turner”: Invisible Man by Ralph Ellison. I don’t know what it was about the book, but I couldn’t put it down and enjoyed it immensely.

Extra of the day: A “rough draft” of this post in audio form (as done by me in the car, as you can hear by the wind in the background):

Apologies to Marie for slaughtering your online name. For correct pronunciation, visit Merriam-Webster.

So in light of the small group of you saying that classics can be “page-turners,” I will ask a different way this week:

What classics, including this time “modern” classics that you wouldn’t classify as “pulp fiction,” would you consider “page-turners”?

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Yahoo BuzzAdd to Newsvine