Monthly Archives: September 2009

Cocaine Blues

As a correspondent for a newspaper, I pick up court reports from a local district justice office every couple of weeks.

Yes, it’s that slow around here, and most of the time the reports are, sad to say, DUIs.

However, every once in a while, I come across those special cases. This week was such a case.

In a report about Billy Bob stealing a gazebo (no, not strange enough yet) was this tidbit:

According to police, Jethro said Billy Bob showed him a receipt from a man named Slick for $2,000 for the gazebo.

On June 27, Slick was interviewed and denied selling the gazebo to Billy Bob. However, Slick said, according to court records, that he had signed a receipt for $200 for cocaine from Billy Bob.

On Sept. 16, Slick took a polygraph and it was determined that he had nothing to do with the theft of the gazebo and furniture, according to police.

As I was reading the report, I, probably like you, did a double-take.

Cocaine?

I had to read over that several times. I can just hear Slick saying to the policeman who interviewed him:

“No, that wasn’t for a gazebo, man. That was for cocaine, you silly.”

Then saying:

“Oops, did I say ‘cocaine’? I mean Co…ca C0la. Yeah, that’s what it was.”

Policeman:

“Um, you said ‘cocaine.’”

Slick:

“Aw, okay, I’m come clean with you, man; it was cocaine.”

Policeman:

“Well, now that we have that cleared up…about that gazebo…hey, wait a minute, not so fast there, Slick…”

Funny thing is that the report didn’t mention if Slick ever was charged with anything, although I guess he could be lying about the cocaine…of course, he did take a polygraph test.

Of course, it’s not admissible in court.

At least, he didn’t shoot anybody.

Humor-Blogs.com

Humor Bloggers

BlogStorm

Feel burnt-out by blogging sometimes? You are not alone

Since this week’s Weekly Geeks topic was my own, I suppose (eyes rolling) that I ought to respond to it. So without further adieu:

The topic in short (for my lengthy explanation, see this week’s Weekly Geeks post) was whether or not after a week like last week with Book Blogger Appreciation Week, do you feel burnt out? If so, why? If not, why not? Secondarily, why do you blog?

Last week in addition to BBAW, I also participated in Agatha Christie Week activities over at Mysteries in Paradise and had my own challenge to read an Agatha Christie book per day, followed by a review. I read six out of eight planned books and reviewed four books during the week, plus two yesterday. As a result, I only posted a minimal amount of BBAW-related posts.  However, by the end of the week, because of Agatha Christie Week, and my own self-imposed goals, I did feel burnt out.

A few months ago, I decided to revamp my blogs (for a listing of other blogs I maintain, see here) to post mainly only three times a week on my main blog, an unfinished person (in an unfinished universe), with crosspostings with my other blogs on certain days of the week. The reason I did that was simple: to cut back on the pressure to blog daily for each of the five blogs I have. For the most part, it has worked until last week when Agatha Christie Week, combined with BBAW, threw me off that schedule.

Do I regret it? No. However, it will make me rethink weeks like the two activities mentioned in the future. I probably won’t participate in weeks like them, with daily posts, in the future. I have enough of a time, committing to three posts on my main blog, which in turn are cross-posted at the other three blogs, including this one. Plus I have another blog, Unfinished Rambler, on which I ramble about whatever and now that I have done away with themed days there, whenever. (For a sample of a silly post, and also in this case a book-related one, see this post from yesterday about my finding a library book I thought was lost.)

All of which brings me to why do I blog anyway?  For me, and I don’t mean to be funny or sound like the Blues Brothers, although this is how it is going to sound anyway, but I feel like I’m on a mission from God.

Yes, I’ve seen the light, and the mission I’ve been given: to share the journey of an unfinished person in all his facets, body, mind and soul, mainly through my main blog, an unfinished person (in an unfinished universe), and through Unfinished Rambler, just to have fun, and not be so “mission”-oriented.

Why share this journey? Because all of us are on this journey and none of us are finished people, no matter how much we may claim to be finished, until our final breath is drawn. Maybe I can encourage you in your own journey, in your struggles with diet and exercise, reading and devotions, by showing you that you are not alone…

…because as the song in the musical “Into the Woods” says:

BREAKING NEWS: Aliens return Agatha Christie book they abducted

Agatha abducted

Back in July, I had a theory that an Agatha Christie book I lost from the library had been raptured. However, tonight I learned that theory might be wrong as I discovered the book in my home office.

I now think it might have been abducted by aliens similar to the photo above and returned.

I had just gone done talking with my sister on the phone when I happened to look down at the floor of my office and…

lo-and-behold-front-cover

THERE IT WAS…

…underneath a case of CDs. I first thought it was another Agatha Christie from the library, because all the ones I get are from the Agatha Christie Mystery Collection and have the same black hardcover. Then I picked it up and…

lo-and-behold-front-cover

…it was the copy of Murder at Hazelmoor (also known as The Sittaford Mystery) which I had lost from the library and for which I already had bought a replacement online.

It wouldn’t be so bad to have a copy of the book except that in my review of it, I had said it wasn’t worth owning a copy, but only worth picking up at the library.

Must be the aliens didn’t think it was worth owning either.

Sources: First photo, from The X-Files; second photo, from album cover of Coulson Dean McGuiness Flint’s Lo and Behold (click on photo to go to hear samples from the album from Rhapsody, if you’re so inclined).

Humor-Blogs.com

Humor Bloggers

Blog-Storm

Cards on The Table

Agatha Christie CollectionTitle: Cards on The Table
Author: Agatha Christie Publication
Year: 1936
Pages: 197
Genre: Mystery
Count for Year: 47

How I discovered

I have joined Kerrie from Mysteries in Paradise with her Agatha Christie Reading Challenge and this is part of that. Also this last week was Agatha Christie Week, which coincides with a celebration of Agatha Christie’s birthday, Sept. 15, 1890, and for that, my goal was to read a novel per day and posting a review here. I did read this one last week, along with five others: The Boomerang Clue, Murder in Three Acts, Death In The Air, The A.B.C. Murders and Murder in Mesopotamia

.

The setup

Hercule Poirot is invited to a party with four murderers who got away with their crime, according to the party host. Upon arriving, he finds himself one of four detectives: Superintendent Battle and Colonel Race, both of whom have appeared in Christie works previously, and Mrs. Oliver, a mystery novelist perhaps modeled after Christie herself. One of the four alleged murderers kills the host during a bridge game, and then the real game begins.

The review

To Poirot, of course, the bridge scores are the key, although Battle doesn’t understand: “What’s the idea of the bridge scores, Monsieur Poirot?” to which Poirot answers:

“They are illuminating, do you not think? What do want in this case? A clue to character. And a clue not to one character, but to four characters. And this is where we are most likely to find it– in these scribbled figures…”

“You think, perhaps, that they are foolish, these questions that I ask? But it is not so. I want to get at the characters of these four players, and when it is only about bridge I ask, everyone is willing and ready to speak.”

The crime itself,as Poirot himself later describes, has “no tangible clues– no fingerprints, no incriminating papers or documents.” The only clue, he says are the people themselves…

“And one tangible clue, the bridge scores. “You may remember that from the beginning I showed a particular interest in those scores. They told me something about the various people who had kept them, and they did more. They gave me one valuable hint…”

That hint? I will not tell, but will say that the way in which Poirot gets to his conclusion is fascinating. In this one, maybe more than any other of the mysteries so far that he has investigated, is the focus on the psychological games that a murderer plays. For that reason, I give this one a 4 out of 5.

My rating system: 5- Classic, must read 4- Worth owning a copy 3- Worth picking up at library 2- Worth skimming at the bookstore 1- Worth being a doorstop For others reviews and thoughts on the book: